Log In
Register
Forum
Topic RSS
19:02, EEST
February 21, 2014
Offline
I’m doing my first steps using the model code generator. The generated code exposes 2 errors:
* The ApplicationInstanceCertificate DataType (ApplicationInstanceCertificate,311,DataType) cannot be found in the OPC UA Stack’s built-in types (that’s where the generated import statement tries to pull it from), and
* the generated setDisplayName() method signature in the interface has a throws StatusException, while the overwritten method in UANode has not.
While the latter can be worked around by commenting out the “throws” clause, the missing ApplicationInstanceCertificateType is a bit more difficult to deal with. The NodeSet2.xml which has been shipped with the SDK does contain the ApplicationInstanceCertificate DataType. Am I possibly missing an import?
NB: the codegen-standalone.jar is labeled with version 2.0.0 while the rest of the SDK is at 2.0.2.
Many thanks,
Hans-Uwe
19:48, EEST
December 21, 2011
Offline
Yes, ApplicationInstanceCertificate is a subtype of ByteString and seems that they are not generated at the moment. Maybe you can use just ByteString instead?
Hmm. setDisplayName() should not be generated, IMO. Or do you have a member that is called such in your type?
The codegen hasn’t been changed between the versions (and the version is currently hard-coded).
20:09, EEST
February 21, 2014
Offline
Yes, ByteString is what I fell back to. Is there a list of currently not generated types available or is this the only one?
Well, shame on me. I indeed forgot about a property, which I carelessly named “DisplayName”. Stupid.
Thanks a lot again!
Cheers, Hans-Uwe
20:16, EEST
December 21, 2011
Offline
Only Enumerated and Structure types are generated at the moment.
The codeine should do a sanity check of it’s own, to avoid the compilation problems with the generated code. Let’s see if we get such added in there at some point 
20:29, EEST
December 21, 2011
Offline
Jouni Aro said
The codeine should do …
I was wondering why I always tend to write ‘codeine’, when I should write ‘codegen’ – until I noticed that the proofreader of my browser (Safari) makes an autocorrection ‘codegen -> codeine’! Had to teach it that it’s a valid word…
Most Users Ever Online: 1919
Currently Online:
15 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
Heikki Tahvanainen: 402
hbrackel: 144
rocket science: 88
pramanj: 86
Francesco Zambon: 83
Ibrahim: 78
Sabari: 62
kapsl: 57
gjevremovic: 49
Xavier: 43
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 0
Members: 731
Moderators: 7
Admins: 1
Forum Stats:
Groups: 3
Forums: 15
Topics: 1529
Posts: 6471
Newest Members:
inilarythikibia, rickykennion, PromotionToold, HypromeImpupe, toneylapham544, rondawolinski7, Marypof5711, roycedelargie91, kourtneyquisenbe, ellis87832073466Moderators: Jouni Aro: 1026, Pyry: 1, Petri: 0, Bjarne Boström: 1032, Jimmy Ni: 26, Matti Siponen: 349, Lusetti: 0
Administrators: admin: 1
