Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
addressSpace.findNode
November 11, 2016
11:42, EET
Avatar
kkukat
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
November 11, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hello,

I’ve written a service which browses the available nodes from server and stores the the variables for other services in a database. After restarting the service it reads known and configured variables from database and subscribes them. To avoid subscribing already unknown nodes (from opc ua server view) i would parse the nodes if they are available.

When i call addressSpace.findNode(NODE ID) then i always get null. If i delay this action and an other thread is browsing the opc server, than findNodes works as expected.

My question is, is findNode not a trustworthy method, or is there a bug?

For detailed process:

NOT WORKING:
connection is established
client.getAddressSpace().findNode(NODE ID); is always null

WORKING:
connection is established
BROWSING:
addressSpace.setReferenceTypeId(
Identifiers.HierarchicalReferences);
rootNodes = addressSpace.browse(Identifiers.RootFolder);
… and so on

AFTER THAT:
client.getAddressSpace().findNode(NODE ID); works as expected

I am using the latest library and given dependencies

Greetings

Karsten

November 11, 2016
18:03, EET
Avatar
Bjarne Boström
Moderator
Moderators
Forum Posts: 1032
Member Since:
April 3, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Assuming by addressSpace you mean the com.prosysopc.ua.client.AddressSpace class.

It works as intended, but the documentation could maybe be made better.
The javadocs as of 2.2.4 state for the id parameter: “id of the (@link UaNode) that is searched for”
It is searches from the AddressSpace’s cache, but does not make any server communication, so it might be a bit misleading. Use AddressSpace.getNode method instead. The SDK uses that method internally from another package in a class called DataTypeConverter, so that is one reason why reason it is public (also type nodes are kept indefinitely in the cache).

– Bjarne

November 14, 2016
8:22, EET
Avatar
kkukat
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
November 11, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Hello Bjarne,

thank you for the quick answer.

Is there no other possibility than checking for existing node encapsulated an try catch?

Karsten

November 14, 2016
10:14, EET
Avatar
Bjarne Boström
Moderator
Moderators
Forum Posts: 1032
Member Since:
April 3, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

You could also call UaClient.read, but it too has try-catch

Based on your previous post, “To avoid subscribing already unknown nodes (from opc ua server view) i would parse the nodes if they are available. “, I would assume the server has dynamic address space, i.e. nodes are added and removed while the server is running (or the server is restarted and the address space is not the same as previously). If it is, then there is no way to make sure the node exists other than making a call to the server and those calls are modeled in the SDK as ‘throw exception when calling fails’.

– Bjarne

November 14, 2016
13:37, EET
Avatar
kkukat
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
November 11, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Ok, my solution now is to move the subscription handling in my browsing thread. If a node comes ready it will be subscribed if necessary. When using the getNode Method the AddressSpaceException is thrown. In this exception is no method to get a clearly reason why it is thrown. Only the message for logging contains status information. Would be great when this information will be available in the exception in future. Currently catching this exception is not an option for me, because other AdressSpaceExeptions may occur during this process and can not be identified. Perhaps subscribing the nodes during browsing may be generally the better way and i used the wrong workflow before.

Karsten

Forum Timezone: Europe/Helsinki

Most Users Ever Online: 1919

Currently Online:
15 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Heikki Tahvanainen: 402

hbrackel: 144

rocket science: 88

pramanj: 86

Francesco Zambon: 83

Ibrahim: 78

Sabari: 62

kapsl: 57

gjevremovic: 49

Xavier: 43

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 0

Members: 730

Moderators: 7

Admins: 1

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 15

Topics: 1529

Posts: 6471

Newest Members:

HypromeImpupe, toneylapham544, rondawolinski7, Marypof5711, roycedelargie91, kourtneyquisenbe, ellis87832073466, zkxwilliemae, gabriellabachus, Deakin

Moderators: Jouni Aro: 1026, Pyry: 1, Petri: 0, Bjarne Boström: 1032, Jimmy Ni: 26, Matti Siponen: 349, Lusetti: 0

Administrators: admin: 1